S-22 Posted 2006年4月4日 02:07 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 02:07 请大家协助 Ping 以下 4 组 IP,有助于我们月底前调整机房线路。测试的人越多越好。 219.238.232.168 219.238.232.177 211.147.7.158 211.147.5.12 60.195.250.200 60.195.249.157 60.195.250.42 Ping 结果请跟贴。同时请说明你所用的线路(网通,电信,铁通,联通等等)。 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-SNOW Posted 2006年4月4日 02:26 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 02:26 (edited) 河北联通 \最小值 \最大值 \平均值 219.238.232.168 \ 78 \ 109 \ 95 219.238.232.177 \ 78 \ 93 \ 84 211.147.7.158 \ 123 \ 140 \128 211.147.5.12 \ 87 \125 \103 60.195.250.200 \ 109 \ 140 \119 60.195.249.157 \ 78 \171 \ 121 联通的真不咋地,过两个月换网通的。不让人排版的论坛。 Edited 2006年4月4日 02:27 by X-SNOW 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RNAi Posted 2006年4月4日 02:40 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 02:40 北京1m网通 adsl 1)平均20ms 2)平均19ms 3)平均24ms 4)平均19ms 5)平均62ms 6)平均69ms 除了最后两个,都可以.. 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daGER Posted 2006年4月4日 02:41 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 02:41 俺是河南网通的 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.V. Posted 2006年4月4日 02:57 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 02:57 哈尔滨网通ADSL 1.5M 06年4月4号10点55分测试 219.238.232.168 128.131.130.129 219.238.232.177 122.121.120.121 211.147.7.158 123.119.120.121 211.147.5.12 119.122.121.122 60.195.250.200 118.149.116.145 60.195.249.157 123.126.157.124 前几个比较稳定,后两个60开头的比较跳跃 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rorschach Posted 2006年4月4日 03:20 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 03:20 俺忘了命令了~~ 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scliym Posted 2006年4月4日 03:31 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 03:31 四川网通 Ping statistics for 219.238.232.168: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 67ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 67ms -------------------------- Ping statistics for 219.238.232.177: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 66ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 66ms -------------------------- Ping statistics for 211.147.7.158: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 67ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 67ms -------------------------- Ping statistics for 211.147.5.12: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 66ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 66ms -------------------------- Ping statistics for 60.195.250.200: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 67ms, Maximum = 69ms, Average = 68ms -------------------------- Ping statistics for 60.195.249.157: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 67ms, Maximum = 81ms, Average = 73ms 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-SNOW Posted 2006年4月4日 03:39 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 03:39 俺忘了命令了~~ 开始\运行\cmd\ping+ip地址 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(-____-)BlackCoat Posted 2006年4月4日 04:01 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 04:01 武汉电信 1MADSL 219.238.232.168 110/180/92 219.238.232.177 149/109/147 211.147.7.158 91/97/139 211.147.5.12 54/54/54 60.195.250.200 57/58/57 60.195.249.157 69/72/69 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchutzStaffel Posted 2006年4月4日 04:06 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 04:06 时间紧张…… 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
背德の花 Posted 2006年4月4日 04:06 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 04:06 (edited) 对电信影响较大 武汉电信 219.238.232.168 38~55ms 219.238.232.177 37~53ms 60.195.250.200 48ms~61ms 60.195.249.157 46~61ms 211.147.5.12 38~52ms 211.147.7.158 52稳定 跳ping的都是TTL改变了的!端口选择不稳定。 网通 219.238.232.168 76ms 219.238.232.177 76ms 60.195.250.200 115ms 60.195.249.157 110ms 211.147.5.12 76ms 211.147.7.158 83ms ping值稳定! Edited 2006年4月4日 04:27 by mr_cool 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
诸神之黄昏 Posted 2006年4月4日 04:54 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 04:54 (edited) 北京歌华有线宽带 Ping statistics for 219.238.232.168: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), pproximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 6ms, Maximum = 172ms, Average = 48ms Ping statistics for 219.238.232.177: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 175ms, Average = 48ms ------------------------------------------------------------ Ping statistics for 211.147.7.158: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 77ms, Average = 29ms ------------------------------------------------------------- Ping statistics for 211.147.5.12: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 4ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 20ms ------------------------------------------------------------ Ping statistics for 60.195.250.200: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 15ms Ping statistics for 60.195.249.157: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 13ms, Maximum = 34ms, Average = 20ms Ping statistics for 60.195.250.42: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 43ms, Average = 19ms Edited 2006年4月4日 04:55 by (-__-)a 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
May28 Posted 2006年4月4日 05:12 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 05:12 (edited) 河南网通 4月4日12:40 都不太好 Edited 2006年4月4日 05:13 by May28 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yrh Posted 2006年4月4日 05:26 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 05:26 (edited) 深圳电信ADSL(公司) Pinging 219.238.232.168 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 219.238.232.168: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50 Reply from 219.238.232.168: bytes=32 time=139ms TTL=50 Reply from 219.238.232.168: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50 Reply from 219.238.232.168: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=50 …………………………………………………………………… Pinging 219.238.232.177 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 219.238.232.177: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=114 Reply from 219.238.232.177: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=114 Reply from 219.238.232.177: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=114 Reply from 219.238.232.177: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=114 …………………………………………………………………… Pinging 211.147.7.158 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 211.147.7.158: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52 Reply from 211.147.7.158: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=52 Reply from 211.147.7.158: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=52 Reply from 211.147.7.158: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=52 …………………………………………………………………………… C:\Documents and Settings\yangrh>ping 211.147.5.12 Pinging 211.147.5.12 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 211.147.5.12: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=51 Reply from 211.147.5.12: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=51 Reply from 211.147.5.12: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=51 Reply from 211.147.5.12: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=51 …………………………………………………………………… Pinging 60.195.250.200 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 60.195.250.200: bytes=32 time=103ms TTL=115 Reply from 60.195.250.200: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=115 Reply from 60.195.250.200: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=115 Reply from 60.195.250.200: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=115 …………………………………………………………………… Pinging 60.195.249.157 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 60.195.249.157: bytes=32 time=97ms TTL=51 Reply from 60.195.249.157: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=51 Reply from 60.195.249.157: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=51 Reply from 60.195.249.157: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=51 Pinging 60.195.250.42 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 60.195.250.42: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=115 Reply from 60.195.250.42: bytes=32 time=103ms TTL=115 Reply from 60.195.250.42: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=115 Reply from 60.195.250.42: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=115 Edited 2006年4月4日 05:32 by =FREE=yrh888 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
幽灵侍卫ScreaM Posted 2006年4月4日 06:18 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 06:18 山东济南网通: 219.238.232.168 不通 219.238.232.177 不通 211.147.7.158 不通 211.147.5.12 不通 60.195.250.200 不通 60.195.249.157 不通 60.195.250.42 不通 怎么都不通? 2006.04.04 14:19 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
背德の花 Posted 2006年4月4日 10:21 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 10:21 山东济南网通: 219.238.232.168 不通 219.238.232.177 不通 211.147.7.158 不通 211.147.5.12 不通 60.195.250.200 不通 60.195.249.157 不通 60.195.250.42 不通 怎么都不通? 2006.04.04 14:19 你那儿内网禁用ping命令了 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParPar Posted 2006年4月4日 11:38 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 11:38 (edited) 安徽 电信 网吧内 200604041934 四组服务器均无法到达。 Edited 2006年4月4日 11:38 by ParPar 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
流星MOTO Posted 2006年4月4日 11:49 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 11:49 电信通的就是南北兼顾,电信网通全办 !一样高! 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldteacher Posted 2006年4月4日 12:00 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 12:00 ping 219.*.*.* 211.*.*.* 的延迟只有80MS左右. 60.*.*.* 延迟有180 ms 我 电信的农村用户, 哈哈. 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sulla2 Posted 2006年4月4日 12:28 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 12:28 (edited) 上海长宽 Edited 2006年4月4日 12:38 by sulla2 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
我很欣慰 Posted 2006年4月4日 12:49 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 12:49 北京512k adsl,头三组测试,均在20以内,第四组在70-80之间,测试时间,晚上20:50 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
牛头桑 Posted 2006年4月4日 13:24 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 13:24 我是北京网通adsl 219.238.232.168 平均 15ms 219.238.232.177 平均 30ms 211.147.7.158 平均 26ms 211.147.5.12 平均 31ms 60.195.250.200 平均 64ms 60.195.249.157 平均 77ms 60.195.250.42 平均 61ms 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hardrock Posted 2006年4月4日 15:08 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 15:08 厦门电信 小区光纤10M LAN共享 Microsoft Windows XP [版本 5.1.2600] © 版权所有 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\KENNY>ping 219.238.232.168 Pinging 219.238.232.168 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 219.238.232.168: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=52 Reply from 219.238.232.168: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=52 Reply from 219.238.232.168: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=52 Reply from 219.238.232.168: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=52 Ping statistics for 219.238.232.168: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 124ms, Maximum = 140ms, Average = 132ms C:\Documents and Settings\KENNY>ping 219.238.232.177 Pinging 219.238.232.177 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 219.238.232.177: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=116 Reply from 219.238.232.177: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=116 Reply from 219.238.232.177: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=116 Reply from 219.238.232.177: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=116 Ping statistics for 219.238.232.177: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 124ms, Maximum = 126ms, Average = 124ms C:\Documents and Settings\KENNY>ping 211.147.7.158 Pinging 211.147.7.158 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 211.147.7.158: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=53 Reply from 211.147.7.158: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=53 Reply from 211.147.7.158: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=53 Reply from 211.147.7.158: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=53 Ping statistics for 211.147.7.158: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 136ms, Maximum = 140ms, Average = 139ms C:\Documents and Settings\KENNY>ping 211.147.5.12 Pinging 211.147.5.12 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 211.147.5.12: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=53 Reply from 211.147.5.12: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=53 Reply from 211.147.5.12: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=53 Reply from 211.147.5.12: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=53 Ping statistics for 211.147.5.12: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 124ms, Maximum = 140ms, Average = 128ms C:\Documents and Settings\KENNY>ping 60.195.250.200 Pinging 60.195.250.200 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 60.195.250.200: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=116 Reply from 60.195.250.200: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=116 Reply from 60.195.250.200: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=116 Reply from 60.195.250.200: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=116 Ping statistics for 60.195.250.200: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 125ms, Maximum = 140ms, Average = 133ms C:\Documents and Settings\KENNY>ping 60.195.249.157 Pinging 60.195.249.157 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 60.195.249.157: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=52 Reply from 60.195.249.157: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=52 Reply from 60.195.249.157: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=52 Reply from 60.195.249.157: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=52 Ping statistics for 60.195.249.157: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 124ms, Maximum = 140ms, Average = 134ms C:\Documents and Settings\KENNY>ping 60.195.250.42 Pinging 60.195.250.42 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 60.195.250.42: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=116 Reply from 60.195.250.42: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=116 Reply from 60.195.250.42: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=116 Reply from 60.195.250.42: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=116 Ping statistics for 60.195.250.42: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 124ms, Maximum = 136ms, Average = 127ms 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yrh Posted 2006年4月4日 16:45 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 16:45 (edited) 我在家里用小区宽带,网通的接口,怎么会出现下边的情形:(所有的都这样,没有一个PING得通) Pinging 60.195.250.42 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 10.170.13.254: Destination net unreachable. Request timed out. Reply from 10.170.13.254: Destination net unreachable. Reply from 10.170.13.254: Destination net unreachable. Ping statistics for 60.195.250.42: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms Edited 2006年4月4日 16:46 by =FREE=yrh888 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
幽灵侍卫ScreaM Posted 2006年4月4日 16:46 分享 Posted 2006年4月4日 16:46 20060405 0:44 219.238.232.168 121 219.238.232.177 121 211.147.7.158 121 211.147.5.12 121 60.195.250.200 105 60.195.249.157 95 60.195.250.42 101 济南网通adsl 引用 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.